Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DB Enterprises Developers-Builders, Inc. v. BOROUGH OF NORWOOD
as 2:2021cv02242
Plaintiff:
DB Enterprises Developers-Builders, Inc.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 3:2020cv02239
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BETANCES v. AT&T INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04334
Defendant:
AT&T INC. doing business as AT&T STORE WILKES BARRE, GABBY NORWOOD, OLIVER PHILPOTT and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS BETANCES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORWOOD v. PREMIER PERSONAL CARE, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03709
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY NORWOOD
Defendant:
PREMIER PERSONAL CARE, INC. and LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR-NORWOOD v. FIORE
as 2:2013cv03661
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TAYLOR-NORWOOD
Defendant:
JAMES FIORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America, Thomas F. Hogan, Patrick J. Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
D.B. DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS, INC. v. BOROUGH OF NORWOOD et al
as 2:2009cv03092
Plaintiff:
D.B. DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS, INC.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF NORWOOD and NORWOOD BOROUGH COUNCIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MANELSKI et al v. TINICUM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI, DENISE MANELSKI and others
Defendant:
TINICUM TOWNSHIP, TINICUM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, PETER J. BILLBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
