Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
STEVENS-NUNEZ v. BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2024cv01678
Plaintiff: KAREN MARIE STEVENS-NUNEZ
Defendant: BRISTOL BOROUGH MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, JAMES DILLON, CHIEF JOSEPH MOORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JOHNSON v. PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff: THEMA JOHNSON
Defendant: PROSPECT MEDICA HOLDINGS, SAMUEL SANG-BUM LEE, JIM BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NUNEZ v. REESMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Defendant: CO BLAIN REESMAN, CO LANDON SINCLAIR, CO TRAVIS TRESSLER and others
Plaintiff: FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PITTMAN v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00138
Defendant: P. NUNEZ, REBECCA RIEFER, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff: GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00734
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01281
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NUNEZ PANTOJA v. GOURMET'S DELIGHT MUSHROOMS CO., INC.
as 2:2018cv01368
Plaintiff: MIGUEL NUNEZ PANTOJA
Defendant: GOURMET'S DELIGHT MUSHROOMS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?