Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MABES et al v. MCFEELEY et al
as 1:2021cv02062
Plaintiff:
ERIKA MABES and BRIAN MABES
Defendant:
ANGELA MCFEELEY, NATASHA DAVIS, COURTNEY OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon Bey et al v. The State of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv00480
Defendant:
Robert Dyckman, Oak Park, IL Police Department, D Guzman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher H Cannon Bey, Travis Austin Bey and Damien Holman Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY, IN et al
as 1:2018cv02436
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, IN, MCCORDSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEBOARD v. CAMDEN OAKES ONE, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02116
Defendant:
Redwood Living, Inc. and Camden Oakes One, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAY v. ECKLES et al
as 1:2018cv01545
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY D. DAY
Defendant:
DEMI ECKLES and ERICA OAKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herz v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wendy Herz
Defendant:
David F. Hamilton, Richard L. Young, Executive Committee of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
