Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hammocks Community Association, Inc. v. State of Florida, Office of State Attorney, Eleventh Judicial Circuit
as 1:2022cv22051
Plaintiff:
HAMMOCKS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEY, ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02357
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Duebbert v. St. Clair County et al
as 3:2019cv00717
Defendant:
Office of State's Attorney Appellate Prosecutors of the State of Illinois, Lorinda Lamken-Finnell, City of Belleville, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald R Duebbert and Ronald R Duebbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chenot et al v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2013cv00637
Plaintiff:
Gary-David Chenot and Patricia Cagiano Chenot
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Attorney General, State of Florida, Tenth Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WHITE v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY
as 4:2013cv00079
Plaintiff:
DEXTER W WHITE
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY OF FLORIDA LLC, MICHAEL MILLER, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Strickland et al v. Carroll County, Maryland et al
as 1:2011cv00622
Plaintiff:
Mark Strickland
Defendant:
Carroll County, Maryland, State of Maryland, Carroll County Office of States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rich et al v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2009cv00454
Plaintiff:
Tom Rich and Yvette Rich
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Robert A. Hinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
