Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Timothy Mitchell, Sr., et al v. Norm Wielsch, et al
as 13-17246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MITCHELL, Sr., individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr. and PAULETTE MITCHELL, individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
NORM WIELSCH, Commander, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant:
LESTER GALER, Police Officer, PHIL GALER, Police officer, in his individual and official capacity, SEAN DEXTER, police officer, in his official and individual capacities and others
Timothy Mitchell, Sr., et al v. Lester Galer, et al
as 13-17167
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY MITCHELL, Sr., individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr. and PAULETTE MITCHELL, individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
LESTER GALER, Police Officer, PHIL GALER, Police officer, in his individual and official capacity, SEAN DEXTER, police officer, in his official and individual capacities and others
Timothy Mitchell, Sr., et al v. Lester Galer, et al
as 11-15457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MITCHELL, Sr., individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr. and PAULETTE MITCHELL, individually and as successor in interest to Timothy Mitchell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
LESTER GALER, Police Officer, PHIL GALER, Police officer, in his individual and official capacity, SEAN DEXTER, police officer, in his official and individual capacities and others
Mitchell et al v. City of Pittsburg et al
as 3:2009cv00794
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mitchell, Sr., Timothy Mitchell, Sr., Paulette Mitchell and others
Defendant:
City of Pittsburg, Aaron Baker and Lester Galer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
