Civil Rights Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thomsen v. Armfield et al
as 5:2023cv00904
Plaintiff: William C Thomsen
Defendant: Cory Armfield, Cordell Police Dept and Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00276
Plaintiff: Edward D White
Defendant: City of Tulsa and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brakebill v. Teal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00218
Plaintiff: Jerry Brakebill
Defendant: Ronald Teal, Richard Tyler, Mike Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Downing v. Tulsa Police Dept.
as 4:2019cv00258
Defendant: Tulsa Police Dept.
Plaintiff: Robert Gene Downing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duran v Muse et al
as 4:2016cv00717
Plaintiff: Jonathan Duran
Defendant: Jason B Muse and Tulsa Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harrison et al v. Williams et al
as 6:2016cv00325
Plaintiff: William Harrison, Jr. and Jeannette Harrison Murby
Defendant: Jackie Williams, Kim Johnson, Dustin Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bilder v. Mathers et al
as 4:2015cv00270
Plaintiff: Barry D Bilder
Defendant: Beth Mathers , Ruth Bilder , Church of Holistic Science, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Pryor Police Dept et al
as 4:2010cv00364
Plaintiff: Timothy Shane Smith
Defendant: Pryor Police Dept, Sue Ann and Sgt Blower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Rayl et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00800
Plaintiff: James Fields, Jr
Defendant: James Brian Rayl, Pete Silva, Tulsa Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?