Cases 1 - 10 of 83
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
BRUCE THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ACCOUNTING SERVICE CENTER, AMAZON.COM INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffy v. United States Postal Service et al
as 8:2023cv02891
Plaintiff:
John T. Duffy
Defendant:
US Postal Service, Thomas Magilligan, Robert Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
IZAGUIRRE et al v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
DAVID IZAGUIRRE and JACKELINE CLEMENTS
Defendant:
SANDY WILLIAMS and US POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Weaver v. United States Postal Service
as 6:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Salinas Acosta Weaver and Baby Doe
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCGRUDER v. DEJOY
as 3:2022cv24979
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MCGRUDER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, DOES INCLUSIVE I THROUGH V and LOUIS DEJOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shelly v. Florida Bar et al
as 8:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
Tiffany L. Shelly
Defendant:
Florida Bar, DSK Law Firm, Paul F. Daley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
