Cases 1 - 10 of 18
GILBERT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ROBERT GILBERT, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
**TEST CASE ONLY** Prisoner v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv10000
Plaintiff:
Test Prisoner
Defendant:
Test Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Sessions et al
as 2:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Marce Gonzalez, Lexington Kentucky Medical Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dalton v. Carr et al
as 2:2016cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dalton
Defendant:
John Carr, Ron Neal , Kenneth Gann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv02148
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., JANA CUFFEL, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Plaintiff:
DEBRA SHIELDS and PRINCOLA SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Allen County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Allen County Jail, Indiana State of, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
HOSKINS v. WESTVILLE PRISON
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
HOMER E. HOSKINS
Defendant:
WESTVILLE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PRISON LEGAL NEWS v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01957
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS and GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
PRISON LEGAL NEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
