Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brown v. Dominion Management Services LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Brown
Defendant:
Dominion Management Services LLC and Property Manager Tina-LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Kelly v. Kames Condominium Owners' Association, et al
as 5:2022cv02328
Plaintiff:
Karen O'Kelly
Defendant:
Kames Condominium Owners' Association Inc., Associated Property Management, LLC, Will Jendrisak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Campana et al v. Kaman & Cusimano LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
William A. Campana and Linda Campana
Defendant:
Kaman & Cusimano LLC, Joseph E. Di Baggio, Magistrate Kandi S. O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
O'Kelly v. Kames Condominium Owners' Association et al
as 5:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Jerry Butler, Mary Bird, Karen Merlitti and others
Plaintiff:
Karen O'Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McComb v. Dominium Property Management et al
as 3:2020cv00369
Defendant:
Kristen Dottillis, Karen Kline, Alicia Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Robert McComb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01403
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00742
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
