Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Laws v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Steven J Laws
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Armando Fontes, Joshua R Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rains v. Cravens et al
as 2:2017cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kasey Danielle Rains
Defendant:
Charles Scott Cravens and Fentress County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddy et al v. Land et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddy and Carol Gaddy
Defendant:
George Dwain Land , Clayton Smith , Chad Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Rains v. Patel et al
as 3:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
Connie J Rains
Defendant:
Ishawar Patel and Harry Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Raines v. Carr et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Sandra Raines
Defendant:
Ralph Carr , Jack H Baldwin and City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown et al vs. Bledsoe County, Tennessee et al.
as 1:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Edward Mack Brown, Edward Mack Brown, Charlie Young, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Bledsoe County, TN, Timmie J. Campbell, Junior Lee Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
