Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Meadows et al v. Haws et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Veronica Ruiz Meadows and GrandMaster G-Man Meadows
Defendant:
David Haws, Barry L Olsen, Estate of Darrell Davis/Jodi McCallister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Puerco Valley Fire District et al
as 3:2023cv08636
Defendant:
Randall Anselmo, Puerco Valley Fire District, Toni Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Cliff Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanger et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02498
Plaintiff:
Joel Hanger and Stephanie Stephens
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Lisa VandenBerg, Joseph Kiefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Stuart et al v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2021cv01917
Plaintiff:
Mark E Stuart and Virginia G Stuart
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, WJ Lane, Unknown Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wilkie
as 4:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott Williams
Defendant:
Robert L Wilkie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sosa v. Randall et al
as 4:2019cv00004
Defendant:
Tombstone, City of, Unknown Parties, Robert Randall and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Armstrong v. Warner
as 2:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
Andre William Armstrong
Defendant:
Randall Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fressadi v. Glover et al
as 2:2016cv03260
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi
Defendant:
Kathryn Ann Glover , Rod Robertson Enterprises Incorporated , Pima, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
