Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Darrell Prince v. DC, et al
as 22-7165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Prince
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, a Municipal Corporation, Public Library Staff, Richard Reyes-Gavilan, Executive Director, Chief of All Facets of Library Administration and others
LEE v. CLARK et al
as 2:2019cv17936
Defendant:
LOUIS STELL, JOHN DOES 1-10, ROBERT SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLEY v. REYES et al
as 2:2019cv17911
Defendant:
Louis Stell, Robert Smith, City of Paterson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLINGER et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2017cv02124
Plaintiff:
FRANCEL BELLINGER , IOLA ANYAN , SE - NE FRIENDS OF THE CAPITOL VIEW LIBRARY and others
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER , GREGORY J. MCCARTHY , RICHARD REYES-GAVILAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayqueena Johnson v. The County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv01375
Defendant:
Sgt John Carlberg, Sgt John Carlberg, Deputy David Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Rayqueena Johnson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04581
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Deborah Nuzzi, et al v. St. George Community Consolida, et al
as 10-1730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH NUZZI and THOMAS NUZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. GEORGE COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 258, RICHARD REYES, WILLIAM BODEMER and others
Deborah Nuzzi, et al v. St. George Community Consolida, et al
as 10-1731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH NUZZI and THOMAS NUZZI
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. GEORGE COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 258, RICHARD REYES, WILLIAM BODEMER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
