Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Riley v. Petal MS City Government et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jay Riley
Defendant:
Petal MS City Government and Petal Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Attala County, Mississippi Branch of the NAACP et al v. Evans
as 4:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Doug Evans
Plaintiff:
Antonio Riley, Charles Hampton, Ruth Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Manning v. Desoto County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00051
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Manning
Defendant:
Desoto County, Mississippi, James Albert Riley, Jane Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Personhood Mississippi et al v. Hood et al
as 3:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Personhood Mississippi and P. Leslie Riley, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Delbert Hosemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Shea v. DeSoto County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Shea and Thomas John Shea
Defendant:
DeSoto County, Mississippi, Mark Griffis, Mark Work and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
