Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KIMBROUGH v. MOORE et al
as 1:2023cv01832
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KIMBROUGH
Defendant:
TYLER MOORE, DOUGLAS STOUT, POLICE OFFICER NATHAN GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
MACLIN et al v. RILEY et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACLIN and VICKIE DRIVER
Defendant:
LUCAS RILEY, ALEXANDER GREGORY, CARL CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYERS v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
TANISHA MAYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, PAIGE BOVA KERVAN, CHRITINE KERL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JAMES-RILEY et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
as 3:2021cv00166
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY LEA ANN JAMES-RILEY and AARON J. RILEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASH v. ROTHENBERG et al
as 1:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
CASSIUS ASH
Defendant:
MARC ROTHENBERG, CARLISLE, VICKY NEIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, KROGER, INC, CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEARD v. GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01413
Defendant:
GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC., JOSEPH H. HOGSETT, Board of Directors of The Excel Center, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Dionne Leard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
