Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trimble v. Castro Rios et al
as 2:2019cv00665
Defendant:
Rosario R Castro Rios, Joshua Lopez, Thomas R Busatta and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Trimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-16304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Wade Robertson v. Richard Honn, et al
as 18-15933
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE ROBERTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD A. HONN, CATHERINE D. PURCELL, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN and others
Robertson v. Honn et al
as 3:2017cv01724
Plaintiff:
Wade Anthony Robertson
Defendant:
Richard A. Honn, Catherine D. Purcell, Judith A. Epstein and others
Miscellaneou:
Ty Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Aurora Police et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Aurora Police, John Bennett, Thomas P. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jan Van Dusen v. Catherine Purcell, et al
as 16-16983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN VAN DUSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE D. PURCELL, Presiding Judge of the State Bar Court, San Francisco, JUDITH A. EPSTEIN, Review Judge, San Francisco, RICHARD A. HONN, Review Judge, Los Angeles and others
Van Dusen v. Purcell et al
as 3:2016cv04976
Plaintiff:
Jan Van Dusen
Defendant:
Catherine D. Purcell, Judith A. Epstein, Richard A. Honn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Richmond County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2013cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Adam Henderson
Defendant:
Richmond County Sheriff Office and Jerry Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
