Civil Rights Cases
Rufus Dillard v. Robert Ambroselli, et al
as 13-56623
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUFUS DILLARD
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT AMBROSELLI, Director of California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation and KENNETH K. SO, Judge
Stephen Turner v. Melody Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15802
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN B. TURNER
Defendant - Appellee: MELODY SMITH, GREGORY SIMS, JOHN BENT and others
Stephen Turner v. Melody Smith, et al
as 13-15171
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN B. TURNER
Defendant - Appellee: MELODY SMITH, GREGORY SIMS, JOHN BENT and others
Serafine v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00274
Plaintiff: Lucas M Serafine
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation , Matthew Cate , CDR Division of Adult Parole Operations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05176
Plaintiff: Stephen B. Turner
Defendant: Melody Smith, Gregory Sims, John Bent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Dunkin et al
as 2:2010at01747
Defendant: John Dunkin, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Robert Ambroselli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mbacke v. Dunkin et al.
as 2:2010cv03217
Defendant: John M. Dunkin, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Robert Ambroselli
Plaintiff: Mamemor Mbacke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mario Abernathy v. T Mendoza et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv00381
Plaintiff: Mario Abernathy
Defendant: Robert Ambroselli, Matthew Cate, Kenneth Ford and others
Mario Abernathy v. T Mendoza et al
as 8:2010cv00235
Petitioner: Mario Abernathy
Respondent: Robert Ambroselli, Matthew Cate, Kenneth Ford and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?