Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reardon v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Lafayette County, MS, Lafayette County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rayburn v. Lamar County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Rachel Green, Danny Rigel, Lamar County, Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Allen Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00792
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Clay County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Harris
Defendant:
Forrest Allgood, Honorable Lee Howard, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Warren C. Flowers
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Rachel A. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Williams v. Herrington et al
as 2:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Rachel Williams
Defendant:
Kevin Herrington, Town of Stonewall, Mississippi, Stonewall Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Karen A. Smith et al v. Tishomingo County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Karen A. Smith , Leah Locke , Chelsea Morton and others
Defendant:
Tishomingo County, Mississippi, Glenn Whitlock, Benny Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
