Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.S.J. et al v. Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services et al
as 3:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
K.S.J., Natalie Cuzdey and Gilbert Cuzdey, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services, Andrea Sanders, Jill Franks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Tackett v. Feller et al
as 3:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Brian Tackett
Defendant:
Katrina Feller, Moore, Cockrell, Goicoechea & Johnson, P.C., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arnold et al v. Willis et al
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Keisha Arnold and Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Avery Willis, Kenya McCarty, James Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Howell et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Reed Howell, Trace Carlock, Vicki Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reed v. City of Clinton, Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
John Reed
Defendant:
City of Clinton, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00715
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
