Cases 1 - 10 of 14
KAMATE v. City of Detroit et al
as 5:2017cv13882
Defendant:
City of Detroit , YARLEN HENRY , DOMINIQUE REESE and others
Plaintiff:
RAMONA KAMATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lietzke v. Montgomery, County of et al
as 2:2017cv12922
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery, County of, Reese McKiney and D.T. Marshall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Baker et al v. Schwarb et al
as 2:2014cv10784
Plaintiff:
James Baker and Shyama S Nixon
Defendant:
Randall Schwarb, Thomas Phillips, Todd Langenderfer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. The School District of the City of River Rouge et al
as 2:2012cv12120
Defendant:
The School District of the City of River Rouge , Board of Education of the School District of the City of River Rouge , Dolores Reid and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
v. Warren Consolidated Schools et al
as 2:2011cv15184
Defendant:
Warren Consolidated Schools, James Clor, Roderick Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Warren Consolidated Schools et al
as 2:2011cv15185
Plaintiff:
M.S. Doe
Defendant:
Warren Consolidated Schools, James Clor, Roderick Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese et al v. Albion, City of et al
as 1:2011cv01235
Plaintiff:
Joann Reese and Wallace Reese
Defendant:
Albion, City of, Albion Department of Public Safety, Albion City Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Warren Consolidated Schools et al
as 2:2011cv11176
Plaintiff:
Brandi Odom
Defendant:
Warren Consolidated Schools , James Clor , Roderick Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moroni, et al v. Sterling Heights, City of, et al
as 2:2010cv14897
Plaintiff:
matthew moroni , MATTHEW LOUIS MORONI and LOUIS MORONI
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of, Michael Reese and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
