Civil Rights Cases
Brandt v. McCoy et al
as 1:2017cv01188
Plaintiff: Steven Michael Brandt, Sr
Defendant: Richard . McCoy, Frank W Lerulli, Stewart J Umholtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dwayne Rieco v. William Hebe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-2323
Plaintiff - Appellant: DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM HEBE, District Attorney, RICHARD MCCOY, Esq., ANNE MARIE NASEK, Esq. and others
Dwayne Rieco v. William Hebe, et al
as 14-1855
Plaintiff - Appellant: DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM HEBE, RICHARD MCCOY, ANNE MARIE NASEK and others
Rieco v. Hebe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv02032
Plaintiff: Dwayne L Rieco
Defendant: William Hebe, Richard McCoy, Anne Marie Nasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amy Eckardt v. Stephen Kouri, et al
as 11-3544
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMY E. ECKARDT
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN KOURI, Judge, RICHARD MCCOY, in his official capacity as a Judge in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois, Tazewell County and ALBERT PURHAM, individually and in his official capacity as a judge in the Circuit Court, of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois, Peoria County
Amy Eckardt v. Stephen Kouri, et al
as 11-2831
Plaintiff - Appellant: AMY E. ECKARDT
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN KOURI, Judge, RICHARD MCCOY, in his official capacity as a Judge in the Circuit Court of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois, Tazewell County and ALBERT PURHAM, individually and in his official capacity as a judge in the Circuit Court, of the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois, Peoria County
Eckardt v. Kouri et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01011
Plaintiff: Amy Elise Eckardt
Defendant: Stephen Kouri , Richard . McCoy and Albert . Purham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?