Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
DeOtte et al v. Azar et al
as 4:2018cv00825
Plaintiff:
Hotze Health & Wellness Center, Yvette DeOtte, John Kelley and others
Defendant:
R. Alexander Acosta, Alex M. Azar, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Singh, Ph.D. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01120
Defendant:
Ex-Police Chief Art Acevedo, Austin Police Department, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Ravindra Singh, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2012cv02341
Plaintiff:
JoAnna Wright
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas and Richard W. Kovalchuk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Montgomery County, Texas et al
as 4:2011cv01815
Plaintiff:
Richard W Harvey, Sr
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Texas, Brett Ligon , Tommy Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Carter et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN ELECTRONICALLY TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 2:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Richard W Carter, Lisa James and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
