Cases 1 - 10 of 84
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Davis
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hames v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Rasheeda E. Hames
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elliot v. Richmond County Marshals Office et al
as 1:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Judia H. Elliot
Defendant:
Richmond County Marshals Office, Officer Brantley, Officer Billman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Reaves v. National Law Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv02836
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
National Law Enforcement, Bill Phillips, United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reaves v. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves
Defendant:
Dwanye Lee, John Melvin, Michael Daniel Hucko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
