Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John Carruth v. David Byrne, Jr., et al
as 18-12224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DEE CARRUTH, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID B. BYRNE, JR. and ROBERT J. BENTLEY
Carruth v. Bentley et al
as 7:2017cv01445
Plaintiff:
John Dee Carruth
Defendant:
Robert J. Bentley and David Byrne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greater Birmingham Ministries et al v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
Greater Birmingham Ministries and Alabama State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Robert J. Bentley, Luther J Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-12966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
C.M. et al v. Robert J. Bentley et al
as 2:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
C.M. , A.Q. , S.G. and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Bentley , Thomas R. Bice , Julie P. Magee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Davis v. Gilbert Self, et al
as 13-11228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK D. DAVIS
Interested Party:
SERVICE
Defendant - Appellee:
GILBERT PORTERFIELD SELF, TERRY A. MOORE, ROBERT J. BENTLEY and others
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Doe v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2012cv04044
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Alabama, State of and Robert J. Bentley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Self et al
as 3:2012cv02402
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Davis
Defendant:
Gilbert Porterfield Self , Terry A. Moore , Robert J. Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
