Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. Bartels
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
April Rose Clark
Defendant:
Nicole Bartels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Farney et al
as 3:2022cv08055
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Defendant:
Matthew Farney, Jose Cardenas, Devin Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saliba v. Spokane International Airport et al
as 2:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Bahig Saliba
Defendant:
Spokane International Airport, Richard Holschen, Clay Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County et al
as 4:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Williams
Defendant:
Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct, Paul E Tang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karam v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Pima County, Unknown Parties and Pima, County of
Plaintiff:
Rose A Karam and Rose Ann Karam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Pioneer Medical Group PLCC et al
as 2:2020cv02276
Plaintiff:
Ava Rose
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Pioneer Medical Group PLCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marsolais et al v. Rose Garden Townhouses Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv02044
Plaintiff:
Danelle Marsolais, Chris Marsolais and Danelle Rives
Defendant:
Mulcahy Law Firm PC and Rose Garden Townhouses Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
