Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Branca v. Lottinger et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Branca
Defendant:
Robert Lottinger, Steve Powell, Robert Taylor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Knodell et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Andrew Peal Moore, II
Defendant:
Robert J. Knodell, Jennifer Renner, M. Ruth O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nash et al v. Folsom et al
as 4:2021cv00495
Defendant:
Ruth Montgomery, Henry James Folsom, Dorothy Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa Nash and Donald Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. MU Health Care et al
as 2:2020cv04081
Defendant:
Allen Lavender, MD Suzanne M King, MD Jason Shoemaker and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Paul Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv02328
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Allan D. Lourie, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson and Jeffrey L.G. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heather Dawn Haak v. Ruth A. Belcher, et al
as 6:2018cv03406
Defendant:
Clay T. Jeffries, Colton Clay Sawyer and Ruth A. Belcher
Plaintiff:
Heather Dawn Haak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
