Cases 1 - 10 of 152
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148 et al v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 148, Chad Alfermann, Austin Anderson and others
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Tim Brinker, Todd Boland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Busey Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Busey Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. PNC Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
PNC Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Rapid Robert's
as 6:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Eric V. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Rapid Robert's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. United States Postal Service
as 4:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Lou Fusz
as 4:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Lou Fusz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keys v. Extended Stay America Corporation
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
Extended Stay America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Keys v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
