Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Laverty v. City of Wagoner et al
as 6:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Lyle Laverty
Defendant:
City of Wagoner, Wagoner Police Department, Tony Ponds, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wagoner, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Wagoner, City of, Wagoner Police Department, Tony Ponds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
George Bush, Sr., Joe Biden, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson v. Muskogee Creek Tribal Council The et al
as 5:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Muskogee Creek Tribal Council The, Oklahoma State of, National Indian Gaming Commission, The and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Roberson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. City of Jenks et al
as 4:2019cv00138
Defendant:
Jenks Police Department, Teresa Nowlin, City of Jenks and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pierson, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Ciempa v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2018cv00955
Defendant:
Ken Bartlett, Pam Finch, Del City City of and others
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Ciempa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
