Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Martin v. Circuit Court of St. Louis County et al
as 3:2021cv03209
Plaintiff:
Donald Martin
Defendant:
Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Lucas George Guard, J & M Securities LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalezny et al v. Loomis et al
as 1:2018cv03007
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nalezny and Lee Nalezny
Defendant:
Shawn Loomis , Kane County and APEX3 Security,LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiland v. Kane County et al
as 1:2017cv06111
Plaintiff:
Victoria Weiland
Defendant:
Kane County , Shawn Loomis , Apex3 Security, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe I et al v. Kane County et al
as 1:2017cv03944
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I , John Doe I , Jane Doe II and others
Defendant:
Kane County , Shawn Loomis and APEX3 Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. et al v. Village of Schaumburg et al
as 1:2017cv02153
Plaintiff:
Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. , Illinois Alarm Service, Inc. , D.M.C. Security Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Village of Schaumburg , Tyco Integrated Security LLC and Northwest Central Dispatch System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
