Cases 1 - 10 of 11
M,A, Yah v. Schmaderer et al
as 8:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
M,A, Yah
Defendant:
Todd Schmaderer, Aaron Hanson, Shannon Knuth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Wike v. Douglas County et al
as 8:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Andrea M. Wike
Defendant:
Douglas County, Diane Battiato, Liliana E. Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wike v. Douglas County et al
as 8:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
Andrea Marie Wike
Defendant:
Douglas County, Diane Battiato, Liliana E. Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Condos v. Harling et al
as 8:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Shelli L. Condos
Defendant:
Rebecca Harling, Liz Kurz and Shannon Ebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cox et al v. Ebel et al
as 8:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Cacey Colleen Cox and Hunter Brown
Defendant:
Shannon Ebel, Liz Kurz and Rebecca Harling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Main St Properties LLC v. City of Bellevue, Nebraska et al
as 8:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Bree Robbins, City of Bellevue, Nebraska, Darryl Kuhlman and others
Plaintiff:
Main St Properties LLC and Patrick Shannon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Croghan v. Brunning et al
as 4:2014cv03238
Defendant:
Shannon Anderson, W. Mark Ashford, John Brunning and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Dale Croghan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
