Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hernandez-Castrodad, et al v. Steidel Figueroa
as 23-1872
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE ERNESTO HERNANDEZ-CASTRODAD and IRIS MARTA MARCANO
Defendant / Appellee:
HON. SIGFRIDO STEIDEL FIGUEROA, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Administration of Tribunals of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (OAT)
Mojica-Hernandez v. Steidel et al
as 3:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Yarivette Mojica-Hernandez
Defendant:
Sigfrido Steidel, Pedro Pierluisi, John Bidden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hernadez-Castrodad et al v. Steidel-Figueroa
as 3:2020cv01507
Plaintiff:
Iris Marta Marcano, Conjugal Partnership Hernandez Marcano, Jose Enrique Hernadez-Castrodad and others
Defendant:
Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa and Hon. Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico et al v. Steidel-Figueroa et al
as 3:2019cv02135
Plaintiff:
Yamilette Vargas-Hernandez, Loharina Velazquez-Castro, Alejandro Torres-Rivera and others
Defendant:
Sonnya Isabel Ramos-Zeno, Jose M. Orta-Valdez, Camille Rivera-Perez and others
Interested Party:
Puerto Rico Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Soto v. Ramirez-Nazario et al ***DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS MEMBER CASE. LEAD CASE IS NOW CIVIL CASE NO. 19-1266.***
as 3:2019cv01774
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Giselle Romero-Garcia, Hon. Judge Fernando Torres-Ramirez, Hon. Judge Carlos Vizcarrondo-Irizarri and others
Plaintiff:
Hiram Perez-Soto
Consolidated Defendant:
Maite D. Oronoz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osorio-Ortiz v. Steidel-Figueroa et al
as 3:2017cv02361
Defendant:
Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa, Isabel Llompart-Zeno, Insurance Company ABC and others
Plaintiff:
Holvin Osorio-Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz-Romero v. Oronoz-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2017cv01646
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Maite D. Oronoz-Rodriguez and Sigfrido Steidel-Figueroa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
