Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Conner v. McNeal et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dewayne Cooner and Daniel Dewayne Conner
Defendant:
Kendrick McNeal, Huey Hoss Mack, Dale Byrnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall et al v. The County of Lowndes et al
as 2:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Aaron McCall, Karl Bell and Helenor T. Bell
Defendant:
The County of Lowndes, Lowndes County Commission, Joseph Barganier, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Whigham et al
as 2:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
William R. Smith
Defendant:
JuJuan Whigham, Derek Simmons, Dennis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. County of Limestone, Alabama et al
as 5:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Deputy Jake Abernathy, Srt. Commander Rhett McNatt, County of Limestone, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Ronald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, A. Simmons, Yolanda Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Curtis Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
