Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2020cv00230
Plaintiff:
Deryl Baker
Defendant:
Jaimie Wabel, Kevin Hines, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Browning et al
as 2:2019cv00118
Defendant:
Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, Municipal of Prentiss, Richard Browning and others
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracks et al v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
Carl Bracks , Ruthie Bracks , Shedia Calloway and others
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, City of Wiggins, Mississippi, Chris Ory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracks et al v. Farmer et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Plaintiff:
Carl Bracks , Ruthie Bracks , Shedia Calloway and others
Defendant:
Mike Farmer, Stone County Sheriff Department and Officers John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dearman v. Stone County School District et al
as 2:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Kristi Dearman
Defendant:
Stone County School District and Gwen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
