Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Robinson v. Terry et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beaulieu v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Shelby County Commission, The, Chad Scroggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Betty Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner Jefferson Dunn, Commissioner Ruth Naglich, Warden Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meadows et al v. Leeds, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Frank Meadows and Quinton Leroy Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Leeds, City of, Thomas William McDonald, McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Catoe v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Will Catoe
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
