Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYERS v. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA., W LOUIS/SANDS, US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYERS v. FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE TRANSFER PHILADELPHIA, PA., W LOUIS/SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Treadwell et al
as 1:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Reginald Troy Phillips
Defendant:
Mark T. Treadwell, Leslie Abrams Garddner, Clay D. Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADSHAW v. LANGSTAFF
as 7:2019cv00171
Defendant:
THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF
Plaintiff:
SIGFRID N BRADSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIDDENS v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2019cv00141
Defendant:
NATHANIEL HAUGABROOK, GEORGIA BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WAYNE CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ricky Giddens, et al v. Hugh Lawson, et al
as 17-10169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge, W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior District Judge, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, Magistrate Judge and others
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard et al v. Collins et al
as 2:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Doug Collins, Nathan Deal, Casey Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
