Cases 1 - 10 of 10
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CALHOUN v. TOMLINSON et al
as 4:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
VENITA ODESSIA CALHOUN
Defendant:
JOHN CASON, FRITO-LAY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2015cv00726
Defendant:
CHAD AHREN, MARIA HINTON, INDIANA UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Rogers v. Oradat
as 1:2011cv00408
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Larry Oradat, Janet Pearson, Joe Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
