Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Tucker v. Tahlequah, City of et al
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Barry Tucker
Defendant:
Tahlequah, City of and Matthew Frits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loftis v. Tucker et al
as 6:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Sterling Tucker and Brylun Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Elk City Police Department et al
as 6:2020cv00461
Plaintiff:
Markeith D. Tucker
Defendant:
OMAG and Elk City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
as 6:2019cv00295
Plaintiff:
Markeith D. Tucker
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Carmelita Reeder Shinn and Timothy D. DeGiusti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. United States Court of Appeals for Tenth Circuit et al
as 6:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Markeith D. Tucker
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma and United States Court of Appeals for Tenth Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
