Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Moak v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
GREGORY MOAK
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE Van McDaniel, OFFICER ARNOLD STEVENS, OFFICER TED ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill and **Sanctioned/Barred* Lisa Hill
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, T Washington, Charlie Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (DO NOT USE)
Whalen et al v. Morice et al
as 2:2020cv01265
Defendant:
City of New Orleans Police Department, Gerald A. Turlich, Jr., Mark E. Morice and others
Plaintiff:
Ladner's Industries, Sarah A Whalen, Theodore Ladner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv17747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
D'Aquin v. Giovani, et al
as 2:2016cv13298
Plaintiff:
Thomas D'Aquin
Defendant:
Biagio Giovani, Shieila Combs, St Vincent de Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Amos et al v. Joiner et al
as 6:2014cv02344
Plaintiff:
Mattie Amos, Shawn Powell, Madilyn Powell and others
Defendant:
Rodney Joiner , International Fidelity Insurance Co , Stan Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donley v. Ordeneaux et al
as 2:2009cv06422
Plaintiff:
Floyd P Donley, Sr
Defendant:
Allen Ordeneaux, III, Joey Phillips, Dominic Cuti and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jenkins v. Westwego City et al
as 2:2009cv03033
Plaintiff:
Margaret C. Jenkins and Margaret C. Jenkins
Defendant:
Westwego City, Daniel P Alario, Sr, John I. Shaddinger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Addison v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2008cv03530
Plaintiff:
Ted Addison and Ted Addison
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Fred S. Bowes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
