Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HARLEY v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
MARY HARLEY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, POLICE DISTRICTS 34TH 35TH 15TH 2ND, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2022cv04965
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DEJESUS v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv05493
Plaintiff:
REINALDO DEJESUS, JR.
Defendant:
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, OFFICE OF THE CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIHEL v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 2:2014cv06880
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DANIHEL
Defendant:
OFFICE OF PRESIDENT, US HUD, US SENATOR PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
