Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Gov. Wes Moore
as 1:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Toni Marie Davis
Defendant:
Gov. Wes Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Biden, Jr.
as 1:2021cv02904
Plaintiff:
Toni Marie Davis
Defendant:
The Federal Government and Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dewitt v. Ritz et al.
as 1:2018cv03202
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewitt
Defendant:
William Ritz, Kevin Turner, Chris Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin v. City Of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv03470
Plaintiff:
Toni McLaurin
Defendant:
City Of Baltimore, P.O. Laronde Fabien, John Doe Officers 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chae Brothers, Limited Liability Company et al v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore et al
as 1:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Chae Brothers, Limited Liability Company , John Han Chae , Han Bok Chae and others
Defendant:
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore , City of Baltimore , Baltimore City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
