Cases 1 - 10 of 60
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. SNODGRASS et al
as 1:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
LANZELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JONATHAN DAUD SNODGRASS, MICHEAL CONNER, ANDREW MICHEAL STORIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLONDELL v. MOORESVILLE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
KRISTEN BLONDELL
Defendant:
MOORESVILLE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION, RANDY TAYLOR and DONALD TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
WILLIAMS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
TIFFANIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAY TURNER, JOHNNY ANGEL, ANDREW STORIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
as 1:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
KEITH TURNER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
TURNER v. BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WAYNE TURNER
Defendant:
BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT., CASEY HARDER and CLINT MCQUEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
