Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CATERBONE v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 5:2017cv00867
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caterbone v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2016cv02513
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CATERBONE v. OBAMA et al
as 5:2016cv04641
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Defendant:
BARRACK OBAMA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caterbone v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv01751
Plaintiff:
Stanley J. Caterbone
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, National Security Agency, Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL BUERAL OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FLORES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2013cv00906
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLORES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE NAMED SIERRA MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TURNEY v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER FOR THE SECRETARY OF LABOR FOR OWCP
as 3:2011cv00113
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY TURNEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER FOR THE SECRETARY OF LABOR FOR OWCP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EGHTESAD v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01435
Plaintiff:
SOODEH EGHTESAD
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PA., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
