Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pick Up and Go Moving International, Inc. et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01644
Plaintiff:
Pick Up and Go Moving International, Inc., Tony Johnson and Kim Maddox
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01457
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fairfield Community Clean Up Crew Inc v. Hale et al
as 2:2017cv00308
Plaintiff:
Fairfield Community Clean Up Crew Inc
Defendant:
Mike Hale and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nails v. UPS Delivery Services et al
as 5:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
UPS Delivery Services , Joe Vickers and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Nails v. UPS Delivery Services et al (MAG+)
as 1:2011cv00403
Plaintiff:
Angela Denise Nails
Defendant:
UPS Delivery Services, Joe Vickers and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowhall v. NAACP Beverly Hills et al
as 2:2010cv00679
Plaintiff:
William E. Bowhall
Defendant:
NAACP Beverly Hills, Freedom Activist Network, GOPAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
