Cases 1 - 10 of 695
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANAGER HILGEN, WILLIE WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
