Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jorge Gaxiola, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 12-57178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GAXIOLA
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PLOUCHER, MARIO CELAYA, JAMIE LAZARIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA, JAN PERRY and others
Jorge Gaxiola, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 12-55011
Plaintiff:
JORGE GAXIOLA, MARIO CELAYA, JAMIE LAZARIN and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD PLOUCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA, JAN PERRY and others
Jorge Gaxiola, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-57205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE GAXIOLA
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PLOUCHER, MARIO CELAYA, JAMIE LAZARIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA, JAN PERRY and others
Paul Braunstein, et al v. Arizona Department of Transpor, et al
as 10-17193
Plaintiff:
PAUL BRAUNSTEIN, DBA Baseplans USA
Appellant:
GARY E. LOFLAND, counsel for plaintiff and PAUL S. GERDING, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, VICTOR MENDEZ, LISA WORMINGTON and others
Midwest Fence Corporation et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2010cv05627
Plaintiff:
Midwest Fence Corporation , Victor Mendez and Tom Weisner
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Ray LaHood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jorge Gaxiola et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv06632
Defendant:
Konstantin Akhrem, City of Los Angeles, Danny Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Bennington, Mario Celaya, Jorge Gaxiola and others
Paul Braunstein v. Arizona Department of Transpor, et al
as 10-16564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BRAUNSTEIN, DBA Baseplans USA
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, VICTOR MENDEZ, LISA WORMINGTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
