Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Murren v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00706
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. doing business as WAL-MART, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc doing business as SAM'S CLUB and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Plaintiff:
Adrain Murren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murren v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv05378
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club agent of Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc d/b/a Wal-Mart agent of Wal-Mart and Sam's East Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club agent of Sam's Club
Lead Plaintiff:
Adrain Murren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA R. KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
