Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant:
Austin Turner, Joshua Marley, Chilton County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
STREETER v. AUSTIN et al
as 5:2022cv01462
Petitioner:
ERIC D. STREETER
Respondent:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ball, Jr. v. Matt Tortorici et al
as 2:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
Matt Tortorici, Andra B. Walls, E. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lett v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service of Kansas City MO et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lett
Defendant:
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service of Kansas City MO and Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service of Austin, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Oxford, City of et al
as 1:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bennett
Defendant:
Oxford, City of, Justin Austin and Joshua Hardeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
