Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Grant v. Barr, et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William Barr and James A. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strouse v. Mabry et al
as 3:2020cv03231
Defendant:
Jason Mabry, United States Probation Dallas Division and William Barr
Plaintiff:
James Strouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chi v. Daum et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
cting Director MARK KOUMANS, Director Daniel Bible, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Munguh Pius Chi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Pius Chi v. Martinez et al
as 1:2020cv00069
Respondent:
Robert Daum, Chad Wolf, Hugo R Martinez and others
Petitioner:
Munguh Pius Chi
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
The Estate of James Willie Bass et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Dante Bass, Vivian Bass, GTT and others
Defendant:
William Barr, Federal Bureau of Prisons and T J Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
N.Z.M. v. Wolf et al
as 5:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
N.Z.M.
Defendant:
Attorney General William Barr, Chad Wolf, Daniel Bible and others
Patjane de Marbez v. Untied States Department of State et al
as 4:2019cv04840
Defendant:
Department of State, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Sheny Patricia Marbez and Sheny Patricia Patjane de Marbez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
