Cases 1 - 10 of 287
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Sollenberger v. Varner et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Alan Sollenberger
Defendant:
D. Varner, Emily Walker, Robert Mariani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Meeks v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Frisco Meeks
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Daniel Golden, Lauren Colom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Doe
as 4:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Antoine DeWayne Walker
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamon v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Defendant:
The Penn Millers Insurance Company, Margaret McLaine, Governor Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Seamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seamon v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Defendant:
The Penn Millers Insurance Company, Margaret McLaine, Governor Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Seamon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
