Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. Webster County, Missouri et al
as 6:2022cv03317
Plaintiff:
Karla Williams and Sandra L. Schroeder-Williams
Defendant:
Webster County, Missouri, Sheriff Roye Cole, Missouri State Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
webster v. Russell et al
as 6:2013cv03386
Plaintiff:
Christopher Webster
Defendant:
Jimmie Russell , Toby Marlin and Bobby Sanderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCarthy v. Webster University
as 4:2013cv00692
Defendant:
Webster University
Plaintiff:
Tracey McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
T.W. et al v. Webster Groves School District et al
as 4:2012cv01820
Plaintiff:
T. W. , D. W. and J. W.
Defendant:
Webster Groves School District and John Thoams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robben v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division et al
as 4:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Linda Robben
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division, Missouri Alliance Permanency Program, Frankie Crouppen Thiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
