Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tepe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
United States, Curtis L Collier, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tepe v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Lucille Lattimore Nelson and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Petitioner:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation et al (TV2)
as 1:2020cv00332
Defendant:
Mark Jones, Whirlpool Corporation and Dakia Taylor
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tepe v. Whirlpool Customer Experience Center et al (JRG2)
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Whirlpool Customer Experience Center, Monica Culpepper, Whirlpool cXc and others
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
